Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics. It states that there are limits to how precisely certain pairs of properties of a particle can be known simultaneously. The most common pairs of properties discussed are position \(x\) and momentum \(p\). Mathematically, the uncertainty principle is commonly expressed as: $$\Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}$$

Where:
\(\Delta x\) represents the uncertainty in position.
\(\Delta p\) represents the uncertainty in momentum.
\(\hbar\) is Planck's reduced constant.

While the Planck constant and the reduced Planck constant are often and incorrectly used interchangeably, the correct term in Heisenberg's equation is actually the reduced Planck constant (\(\hbar\)). The reason being that it arises naturally from the Fourier transform and the mathematical structure of wave functions in quantum mechanics.

Heisenbergs Equation

A mathematically rigorous analysis of the Heisenberg equation can be made using Huygens' Principle. This work explores the correlation of the equation with Huygens' principle in the context of wavefront propagation with the ultimate result being the determination of the momentum ratio \(\frac{p}{p'}\) by analyzing integrals derived specifically from wave behavior. The assumptions will be clarified and approximations justified which connect the results to physical principles. Beginning with the integral defining the momentum ratio in its general form, it follows that: $$ \frac{p}{p'} = \int_{a_0}^{\infty} e^{-j\frac{\pi}{2}{t^2}}\ dt \quad$$ The parameter \(x\) being defined as: $$x = h \sqrt{\frac{2(d_1 + d_2)}{\lambda d_1 d_2}} $$

Where:
\(h\) is Plancks Constant representing the quantum nature of the system.
\(\lambda\) is the wavelength of the wave.
\(d_1,d_2\) corresponding to the distance between wavefronts.
\(a_0\) is the Bohr radius.

This integral originates in wave optics, where the complex exponential represents an oscillatory behavior associated with wave propagation. The complex exponential can be decomposed using Euler’s formula where the integral is rewritten in order to separate the real and imaginary components:
$$ \int_{a_0}^{\infty} e^{-j\frac{\pi}{2}{t^2}}\ dt\ = \int_{a_0}^{\infty} \cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2} t^2\right)\ dt - j \int_{a_0}^{\infty} \sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2} t^2\right)\ dt $$ This allows for independent contribution analysis of the real (cos) and imaginary (sin), common practice in analysis of wave phenomena in quantum mechanics. The next step involves establishing the sine and cosine integrals for \(a_0\). The real part of the integral can be expressed as:
$$ \int_{a_0}^{\infty} \cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2} t^2\right)\ dt $$ $$ C(\infty) - C(a_0)\ \text{where}\ C(\infty) = \frac{1}{2} $$ This is a completely anticipated outcome, entirely consistent with calculations of this nature.

The imaginary part of the integral can be expressed as:
$$ \int_{a_0}^{\infty} \sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2} t^2\right)\ dt $$ $$ S(\infty) - S(a_0)\ where\ S(\infty) = \frac{1}{2} $$

Indeed, the integral behavior is justified and consistent with the expected behavior of oscillatory integrals involving complex exponentials. The integrals from \(a_0\) to infinity converge to a result near 0.5 due to the properties of Fresnel integrals, which describe wave-like phenomena in optics and quantum mechanics. The result can be interpreted as the sum of contributions from the real and imaginary components of the wave, starting from the Bohr radius and extending to infinity.

Subsequently, the reconstruction of the momentum ratio can be obtained by substituting the simplified sine and cosine integrals back into the original equation: $$ \frac{p}{p'} = \left[ \left(\frac{1}{2} - C(a_0)\right) - j \left(\frac{1}{2} - S(a_0)\right) \right]$$ The final step normalizes the result using trigonometric identities for \(a_0\): $$\frac{p}{p'} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2\pi a_0} $$ This normalization effectively adjusts the value of the momentum ratio to match the correct physical scaling, taking into account the Bohr radius and wave-like behavior.

Applying the result to Heisenberg's equation:
$$\Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}$$ The resultant expression becomes
$$\Delta a_0 \Delta p \geq \frac{m_e a_0 v_0}{2} = \Delta p \geq \frac{p_c}{2} $$ The uncertainty in momentum, \(\Delta p\) being equal to the classical momentum \(p_c\) suggests that what is conventionally thought of as "uncertainty" is, in this particular case, not uncertainty at all, but rather a directly determined value. In the context of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle if \(\Delta p\) equals \(p_c\) it implies the absence of genuine quantum uncertainty in momentum, directly challenging the very core premise of the uncertainty principle itself.

Conclusion

In classical mechanics, objects are treated as having well-defined positions and momenta. However, quantum mechanics posits that these properties-such as position and momentum-- are inherently uncertain, even in ideal conditions. While \(p_c\) represents a classical, deterministic value, the ground state electron is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics and it should not have an uncertainty in momentum \(\Delta p\) that directly matches its classical momentum. Yet, surprisingly it does. From the expressions shown above, it can be seen that the relationship between distance, momentum and \(\frac{\hbar}{2}\) is entirely unrelated to a variable and uncertain probability, but rather is a direct proportionality constant between the terms, presenting a direct challenge to the uncertainty aspect of Heisenberg's equation.

References: